Monday, December 24, 2007

Nationals Stadium and Eminent Domain


starting at 5:11
I actually think baseball did buy them out, somehow, somehow..

The word will be known someday.
Likewise with the abortion of Washington, D.C.'s South Capitol Mall.

From Sphairos Productions:

We are currently developing a feature fiction film with director Eric Cheevers (Parasite Films) based on the recent destruction of a 4 square block area of Southeast Washington DC where a baseball stadium is currently being built. The film revolves around the stories of people who worked & lived in this exceptionally diverse neighborhood, focusing on the infamous male entertainment nightclubs.

Some 35 hours of video was shot of the neighborhood's demolition and the months leading up to it. These sounds and images will not only constitute a parallel documentary but will also be included in this neo-realist inspired film.


Monday, December 17, 2007

South Capitol/Frederick Douglass Mall
www.HighwaysAndCommunities.com/southcapitolstreet
[should be available at way back machine]

It would have been the 1st major addition to monumental Washington, D.C. since the Lincoln and Jefferson Memorials ...

Yet it would be quietly aborted, un-reported by the media and the private "environmentalist" organizations, with the sole building along South Capitol Street saved being the St. Vincent de Paul Roman Catholic Church ... a conflict also un-reported ...

Illustration from N.C.P.C.'s 1997
"Extending the Legacy: Planning America's Capital for the 21st Century"

St Vincent de Paul Roman Catholic Church:
monument to the selfishness of the Roman Catholic Church heirarchy
in aborting the South Capitol Mall

located at the north-east quadrant of the intersection with M Street,
and the sole building along South Capitol Street necessarily spared by the abortion of the South Capitol Mall

In the 1990s, the United States National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) began exploring ideas for Washington, D.C.'s long term planning, as a follow up to the early 1900s McMillan Commission.

A 1993 article in The Washington Post listed the basic ideas of NCPC's long term thinking to expand upon the cities’ various axis and focal points- e.g. the West and East Capitol axis respectively with the Lincoln Memorial and R.F.K. Stadium -- with attention focused on the axis of South Capitol Street.

Currently a 6 lane surface street with a 4 lane underpass beneath its crossing with M Street, all within a 130 foot building line to building line right of way, South Capitol Street is similar to many other D.C. streets. Its axis though has potential given its potential vista from Capitol Hill to the Anacostia River. And the buildings along it with but one exception are not architecturally significant, and which would be relatively uncontroversial to demolish. Hence, NCPC's vision for South Capitol Street was to redevelop it with a significantly wider space between its flanking building lines for a new open landscaped green space extending as wide as Half Streets SW and SE. In short, the South Capitol axis would be reborn with what would logically be called a South Capitol Mall.

Although NCPC apparently never gave this Mall a name, it's the concept championed by NCPC.'s 1997 publication, "Extending the Legacy: Planning America's Capital for the 21st Century", with its numerous renderings of the future "Mall" along South Capitol, including that on its cover. However, with the South Capitol Street Bridge being officially known as the Frederick Douglass Bridge, the South Capitol Mall could likewise be named the Frederick Douglass Mall.


Cover: NCPC's 1997
"Extending the Legacy: Planning America's Capital for the 21st Century"

South Capitol at Virginia Avenue at site of today's elevated SW/SE Freeway
(Time magazine's 1997 report include the above illustration, but none of the illustrations below that clearly show the broad Mall/Promenade)

South Capitol at M Street

South Capitol at the Anacostia River

Cover: NCPC 2001 "Memorials and Museums"

NCPC 2001 "Memorials and Museums"
Conceptual Framework
(think of the Lincoln Memorial and RFK Stadium)

NCPC 2001 "Memorials and Museums"

"One of several recent concepts for a revitalized South Capitol Street with mixed land uses and new public spaces reaching from the U.S. Capitol to the Anacostia waterfront"

"One of...?!" This would be a hint of things to come...

South Capitol Street Physical Realities



The Abortion of the South Capitol Mall

South Capitol Avenue
(Boulevard)

Passonneau and Partners
www.passonneau.com

This illustration appeared within a slide show by Joseph Passonneau FIA, AIA, and a member of the "Committee of 100" in August 2000 at the National Building Museum in Washington, D.C. The general topic of that presentation was a proposal for a SE Freeway Tunnel between the 11th Street Bridges and the start of the SW Freeway at (or rather above) South Capitol Street. That proposal would not be fully developed: it would show its western tunnel portal being fed by the existing elevated freeway. But it would offer a glimpse of what influential people were pushing quietly.

Can anyone point to any reporting in The Washington Post and other large circulation newspapers, nor the television media, about the opponents of the Frederick Douglas Mall (Promenade), or their efforts to block it?

As this Passonneau plan was shown in August 2000, it came during the Administration of U.S. President Clinton, whose autograph is on the front cover of a copy of NCPC's 1997 "Extending the Legacy: Planning America's Capitol for the 21st Century" affixed to the wall of their headquarters' reception area.

I would call this a South Capitol Avenue because that would be consistent terminology used for other major Washington, D.C. surface streets with a building line to building line right of way width of 130' or 160', such as New Jersey Avenue, Pennsylvania Avenue. The term "boulevard" is not used for such roads, and is more of a term to make it sound more different -- indeed more desirable, special or exotic -- then it actually is.

This is the earliest known to me post 1997 South Capitol proposal to exclude the Frederick Douglass Mall (Promenade), and to instead tear down every building along South Capitol Street and replace with new development, except for one cluster of buildings to the west (left) and St. Vincent de Paul Church to the east, immediately north of M Street SE. Asides from Time Magazine's strange to me reporting in 1997 of NEITHER showing any of the illustrations showing the South Capitol Frederick Douglass Mall (Promenade), nor making any text mention, this was the 1st sign that something was afoot to abort it.

The only opposition I have found mentioned in the various planning reports is in the 2003 NCPC South Capitol Street Urban Design Study: people living along Carrollsburg Place and Half Streets SW whose dwelling would be demolished for the Promenade, or for new real estate development: a distinction forgotten with the DC government's enthusiasm for eminent domain for the latter for such things as Nationals Stadium.

Notably, Passonneau makes no mention of this Promenade, nor this issue, in any of his public writings that I have found, including his web site. Go cruise it -- www.passonneau.com -- and attempt to find anything about South Capitol Street, even his proposal for a narrow South Capitol Street lined almost entirely by new buildings significantly larger then those replaced. Indeed, public discussion or controversy or consciousness over this planning substitution appears to be about non-existent.

It's like those behind this planning substitution feel its would not stand the light of day.

Joseph Passonneau: apologist for the abortion of the South Capitol Mall

Choices!

South Capitol Frederick Douglass Mall
(Promenade)
Illustration from National Capital Planning Commission's
"Extending the Legacy: Planning America's Capital for the 21st Century"

or

South Capitol Avenue
(Boulevard)

Illustration by Passonneau and Partners,
presented in a slide show August 2000 by Joseph Passonneau at the National Building Museum


Un-official stamp "commemorating" N.C.P.C.'s apostacy
Artwork by Ian Goddard' directed by Douglas Willinger

Washington, D.C.'s aborted South Capitol Mall: un-reported by the "mainstream" media and "environmentalist" organizations.

Friday, December 14, 2007

An Unreported Story:

South Capitol Street Frederick Douglass Mall

Illustration from N.C.P.C.'s 1997 "Extending the Legacy"

In the 1990s, the National Capital Planning Commission began exploring ideas for long term planning.

A 1993 article in The Washington Post listed the basic ideas of NCPC's long term thinking to expand upon the city's various axis and focal points- e.g. the West and East Capitol axis respectively with the Lincoln Memorial and R.F.K. Stadium -- with attention focused on the axis of South Capitol Street that would be lined by new buildings replacing most or all of the existing buildings, most of which are industrial buildings, and a good amount of open parking lots, one block of 34 residential dwellings to the west between O and P Streets SW, and the one building with by far the best architecture of anything along South Capitol Street south of the SW/SE Freeway, located at the northeast corner of the inetrsection with M Street SE: St. Vincent de Paul Roman Catholic Church.

Currently a 6 lane surface street with a 4 lane underpass beneath its crossing with M Street, all within a 130 foot building line to building line right of way, South Capitol Street is similar to many other D.C. streets. Its axis though has potential given its potential vista from Capitol Hill to the Anacostia River. And the buildings along it with but one exception are not architectually significent, and which would be reletively uncontroversial to demolish. Hence, NCPC's vision for South Capitol Street was to redevelop it with a significently wider space between its flanking building lines for a new open landscaped green space: in short, the South Capitol axis would be reborn with what we would otherwise call a South Capitol Mall, or, taking and adopting the same of the South Capitol Street Bridge's official name as the South Capitol Frederick Douglass Mall.

Although N.C.P.C. apparantly never gave this Mall a name, it's the concept championed by N.C.P.C.'s 1997 publication, "Extending the Legacy: Planning America's Capital for the 21st Century", with its numerious renderings of the future "Mall" along South Capitol, including that on its cover.


This "legacy" that was to be extended was that of Pierre L'Enfant and of the 4 architects of what is better known as the McMillan Commission plan. L'Enfant established the street grid with its grand west capitol axis National Mall to the Washington Monument The McMillan Commission plan extended this west Mall further to create the Lincoln Memorial west via new landfill. It also significantly reconciled the idea of urban railroads with this L'Enfant/McMillan classicism, by replacing the central north-south railroad link that went across the west Mall as an open cut, with an all new railroad tunnel beneath 1st Street NE/SE. It would further blend this utilitarianism and classicism magnificently with the Beaux Arts Union Station with its curved segment of Massachusetts Avenue NE


This legacy extension would have followed that of the creation of the western extension of the west Mall with its Reflecting Pool and Lincoln Memorial.


It was celebrated by the U.S. Post Office release of a $1 stamp featuring the Lincoln Memorial on February 12, 1923. (scott 571)

The next time the U.S.P.S. released a stamp that illustrated some portion of the west Mall that comes to mind is a 37 cent "commemorative" stamp for Washington, D.C. on September 23, 2003. (scott 3813) It has a diamond orientation -- mimicking that of D.C. featuring a plan view (overhead) portion of the L'Enfant street grid, flanked by isometric photographs of the Washington Monument and a row of charming late 1800s townhouses.

http://www.usps.com/communications/news/stamps/2003/sr03_048.txt

Background and details on the stamp:

The District of Columbia stamp is shaped like a diamond, as was the original 100 square mile tract of land chosen to be the permanent site of the nation's capital.

Early in U.S. history, different cities took turns serving as the U.S. capital. Then, in 1790, the U.S. Congress authorized the establishment of a permanent capital on federal land. That land would become the District of Columbia (for Christopher Columbus). President George Washington selected the exact site in the District where the capital city would be built (the city would eventually bear his name). The land for the District was ceded to the United States by Maryland and Virginia; about a third of that land was returned to Virginia in the mid-1800s, and the diamond shape was no more. Today the District encompasses almost 69 square miles.

Designed by Greg Berger, the District of Columbia stamp design features in its top quadrant a detail from a plan of Washington developed by Pierre Charles L'Enfant in 1791. This French-born engineer and architect was asked by President Washington to design the plan for the city. Though L'Enfant was dismissed from his job the next year, much of his plan was eventually implemented and can be seen in the wide avenues radiating from the White House ("President's House" on the plan) and the U.S. Capitol ("Congress House" on the plan). L'Enfant also envisioned the sweeping view from the Capitol westward along the National Mall - the long expanse of green visible near the center of the plan, as shown on the stamp.
The right quadrant of the stamp shows typical row houses in a Washington neighborhood. These particular houses are in the Shaw neighborhood. Shaw was designated an historic district in 1985.
Cherry blossoms fill the bottom quadrant of the stamp. In 1912 Japan presented Washington with cherry trees as a symbol of international friendship, and today more than 3,700 trees grow around the Tidal Basin near the Jefferson Memorial; in East Potomac Park; and on the Washington Monument grounds. Each spring hundreds of thousands of residents and visitors celebrate Washington's famous blooms at the annual Cherry Blossom Festival.

The left quadrant of the stamp is a view along the National Mall featuring three of the most widely recognized structures in the country: the U.S. Capitol (background), the Washington Monument (center) and the Lincoln Memorial (foreground). The red towers of the Smithsonian Institution Building, or "Castle," also can be seen just to the right of the Washington Monument.



Notably to me, is how this L'Enfant street view is cropped.

To the left, it is cropped to truncated the National Mall to roughly its originally proposed length.

This makes sense when one realizes that this is the L'Enfant street grid and not the L'Enfant/McMillan street grid. This is apparent with magnification with its open canal and its lack of any Union Station (or any sign of any railroads, let alone grade separated highways.

To the right it is cropped by the row of charming townhouses, far enough away from the U.S. Capitol to show some of the street grid, but close enough to obscure the area of South Capitol Street where NCPC's Extending the Legacy envisioned its "Mall" for South Capitol Street.

How this stamp arrays these images appears largely symmetrical, as does the L”Enfant plan which centers its diamond not at the North Capitol Street axis, but rather to the west, with this stamp centering the diamond between 7th and 9th Streets NW/SW.

However, its presentation of an illustration of the un-extended plan surrounded by illustrations of latter additions, with the text commemorating "USA Washington District of Columbia The Nation's Capital", obscures the very South capitol Street corridor that was targeted by 3 separate official government studies that very same year this stamp was issued.

Its selection of using the original western end of the west National Mall as a line to mirror to the east could suggest the idea of not extending any legacies with extending any green ways/linear parks beyond the Lincoln Memorial shown in the photo to the stamp's left.

That stamp would have made a good means to commemorate this future National Mall extension, supplementing the existing West Mall with a South Mall.

Instead, its design would subtly reflect a decision to abandon the concept of a Mall for South Capitol Street, symbolically cropping/obscuring South Capitol Street; its March 23, 2003 release would fall right between the release of the present idea of an all new stadium up against the east side of South Capitol Street as an option in November 2002, and the U.S. National Capital Planning Commission’s abandonment its "key-note" concept from its 1990s planning. The selection of that stadium site was publicly announced around September 22, 2004.

That location for the stadium, combined with the idea of insisting upon symmetricy sometimes, would shrink the very idea of a "monumental gateway" for South Capitol Street southwards from a 50-400 foot wide linear park extending from Virginia Avenue to the Anacostia River, a traffic circle entirely south of Potomac Avenue, squished vertically to somewhat appear as a "Mall-like park."

In light of this, obscuring the South Capitol Street area on this stamp has an undeniable irony.

The Un Reporting 2003+

The Un Reporting 1996+

Why Was Not The Public Informed?

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Would this have helped?



Useful reading

(excerpt)

Why does the District need a planning commission? It would help educate the city government, developers and citizens in every neighborhood about the planning process, which currently is not well understood. Yes, we have a comprehensive plan, but it is, in effect, a triumph of good graphics and ballyhoo over substance. A planning commission could help citizens and public officials understand this and set their sights higher. The D.C. Council vacuously cites the comprehensive plan, but always manages to find a way to defer final action on anything the plan suggests. Then, in haste, it adopts whatever has emerged. This amounts to political flatulence, rather than legislating as the law requires.

A planning commission for the District would provide some parity with the National Capital Planning Commission, a heavily funded agency interested primarily in the federal government’s holdings. The NCPC also calls the shots, ultimately, on whatever the local planning and development office produces in the way of a comprehensive plan.

There is no legal barrier to the city establishing a planning commission. The power of the mayor to do exactly this was confirmed in a 2003 legal opinion by Covington & Burling. Copies of that memorandum of law written for the Committee of 100 were furnished to members of the Council, then-Mayor Tony Williams and Office of Planning officials. They ignored it. The same memorandum was given to the current mayor and his director of planning. They, too, have ignored it. A planning commission might, after all, provide some sort of check on the mayor’s and deputy mayor’s adventures in development.

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Pope Benedict to Hold Mass at Washington Nationals Stadium:
Expect the "... King of the World!!!"

The Pope will tentatively hold Mass next April at Washington Nationals Stadium, days after its opening day.

In describing this stadium's clubhouse, Jacqueline Dupree uses the term "I'm King of the World".

I think that's a plausible description of someone who will be there next April.

With the Douglass Bridge viaduct now demolished, the views looking north on South Capitol Street easily encompass both the ballpark and the Capitol dome. The Administration building at right is now topped out. (10/21/07)
Above photo and caption by Washington Post real estate reporter Jacqueline Dupree http://www.jdland.com/dc/stadium.cfm?tab=no2


Note the knife-edged clubhouse to the right.

Looking across the roof of the under-construction admin building (or, as I call it, the bow of the S.S. Nationals), toward South Capitol Street and points south, including the new intersection at South Capitol and Potomac. I'm King of the World!!! (9/1/07) above photo and caption Washington Post real estate reporter Jacqueline Dupree http://www.jdland.com/dc/stadium.cfm?tab=no3

Jacqueline Dupree said it. That's the sentiment of someone who will be standing near that "bow" next April!

More...
U.S. N.C.P.C.'s Lies about Latest Demolition Special-
Camden's 1325 South Capitol Street
Falsely Claims Compliance with recommendations of Extending the Legacy

NCPC Executive Director Patricia E. Gallagher (center),
with NCPC Chairman John V. Cogbill, III (right)
http://www.ncpc.gov/UserFiles/File/NCPC%20Commission%20Actions%20and%20EDRs/2007%20NCPC%20Commission%20Actions%20and%20EDRs/August%202007/8.2.07%20-%20ZC%2006-41%20(delegated)%20Camden%20dev.%20on%20South%20Capitol%20St._.pdf

Pursuant to delegations of authority adopted by the Commission on August 6, 1999, 40 U.S.C. §8724(a), and DC Code §2-1006(a), I find that the proposed planned unit development and related map amendment for the Camden residential development at 1325 South Capitol Street would not be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the National Capital, nor would it have an adverse impact on any federal interests. ...

The project is located at 1325 South Capitol Street on Square 653, Lot 111. The proposed map amendment will rezone the property to C-3-C (Commercial) from C-2-C. The C-3-C zoning permits a maximum height of 90 feet and Floor-to-Area Ratio (FAR) of 6.5. The C-2-C permits 90 feet in height and an FAR of 6.0. The project consists of an 11-story residential structure at 110 feet in height. The project is setback 15 feet from the South Capitol Street right-of-way, and steps down to 70 feet on its western side, adjacent to the existing residential town homes.

This map amendment is consistent with the recommendations of the South Capitol Street Task Force and the Extending the Legacy Plan. The project respects the 15-foot setback for South Capitol Street as recommended by the Task Force [BUT NOT BY EXTENDING THE LEGACY] and provides new residential opportunities for the emerging redeveloped neighborhood. As such, this proposal will not negatively impact any federal interests nor be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the National Capital.

Opening up the South Capitol vista was a major point of NCPC's planning through the 1990s with Extending the Legacy: Planning America's Capital for the 21st Century, and as late as September 2001 with its publication Memorials and Museums.


But NCPC like the rest of our government would mysteriously go apostate- a decision benefiting only a single building along South Capitol Street, the St. Vincent de Paul Church at the intersection with M Street.
Demolition to Begin for New Demolition Special:
The Continuing Desecration of the Extending the Legacy Plan

Future -- post 2012 -- Eminent Domain for Public Use?

A rendering of 1345 South Capitol Street, a 244-unit residential building under development by Camden. Plans are for construction to start in 2008; site demolition is scheduled for late October/early November 2007. (Rendering from the WDG Architecture web site.) Illustration and caption from Jacqueline Dupree

Land to be cleared for condo project -- 1345 South Capitol Street SW -- which itself conflicts with U.S. National Capital Planning Commission's South Capitol Mall seen on the cover of Extending the Legacy: Planning America's Capital for the 21st Century, and hence will require eminent domain for public use.

Anyone moving into this structure should know of this conflict, and thus understand that it will need to be removed, via eminent domain for public use.

Of course this could be avoided simply if the project were shifted a few hundred feet west.

Then it would ultimately be worth more money because it would be fronting the grand monumental promenade of the South Capitol Mall.

As of this writing, that could still be done.

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

The Historic Re-Closing
of the East of South Capitol Street vista:
(one year later)
if only temporarily ...


March 31, 2007 9:36 AM



July 1, 2007 11:33 AM Click to see all available photos of this location.

U.S. National Capital Planning Commission's
1990s proposal for what would have been a
South Capitol Frederick Douglass Mall-
now blocked by Nationals Ballpark Stadium

Friday, June 08, 2007

Jacqueline Dupree Rome Over Free Speech

Douglas-- I removed the links because your blog no longer is focused purely on South Capitol Street. Your difficulties with the government are outside the scope of my interest. --jd

You do care about free speech? Or, do you feel that we should instead live in a theocratic dictatorship, where people are targeted for writing things that the rich powerful (and corrupt) would rather keep in the darkness?

Would you like a society where what you or I or descendants to have to fear about what they write, lest an apostate (truth-fearing) government imprison them?

By dropping my links at this time, I get the distinct impression that you favor the later. Am I correct? Or ...? Sincerely Douglas Willinger wwwfreespeechbeneathUSHS.blogspot.com

Jacqueline Dupree's reply to me above. She writes a blog about redevelopment in DC SE, and works for The Washington Post.